Connect with Uncommon Knowledge
|
|
|
|
|
RabidChicken
Junior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:04 pm
|
| Necrophilia |
 |
Anyone here know someone who has it? I know a few.
What do you think of it? I'm fine with it although others think it's gross. |
thefool
Senior Member
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 3645
Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:03 am
|
Hmmm you mean as in passive or active?
In the case of active:
I don't see how this is justifiable tbh...
I mean. Do the dead people to whom the dead bodies belonged give explicit permission to touch their bodies in sensual/sexual ways after they pass away? If not i don't see how it can be acceptable... |
launchboxbill
Preferred Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 661
Location: sydney
Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:30 pm
|
i think its fine for a person to think about f***in dead people, as long as its a thought. as for actions concerned, while i think its disgusting and unhealthy, i dont see anything morally wrong with it as long as the person didnt have a part in the death.
id not do it, but a dead person has no feelings. theyre a lump of meat when they have no mind /soul (if you believe in that). |
RabidChicken
Junior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:21 pm
|
They're passive types. It's thought. |
genniangel0
Junior Member
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 75
Location: Tennessee, USA
Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:42 am
|
| Never heard of anyone that liked that! |
|
I haven't ever known anyone who would like to do that. I really don't think it would be sexually healthy. I have read about people who 'pretend' to be dead...like put the white makup on...grey the lips and eyes and sit in a freezer to get the 'appearance' of being dead for sexual purposes...but I can't say that would be sexually healthy. I also think that it is borderline rape....as they do not have permission to have sex with that person by that person...if they are dead or not. Just my opinion! |
launchboxbill
Preferred Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 661
Location: sydney
Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:59 am
|
that would make f***in the couch rape, because it hasnt given consent, while having the same capacity to give consent as a dead person |
genniangel0
Junior Member
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 75
Location: Tennessee, USA
Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:13 am
|
| In my opinion; you are wrong |
|
The couch hasn't ever been alive....a dead person is just that...a dead person! They may be dead... but they were once alive! A sofa hasn't ever been alive...so it couldn't ever give consent....a person has been alive...you are thinking of a dead person as nothing...but it isn't nothing...it is the remains of a human. |
Nimba
Junior Member
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 37
Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:16 am
|
It is degrading and morally wrong. It is disrespectful to someone's body. I can't believe everyone is talking so casually about this... |
launchboxbill
Preferred Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 661
Location: sydney
Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:58 am
|
the material of the body once a person is dead first of all is different to that of a living body in many ways. besides the point, a couch is made of perhaps leather, which was once a living animal just like a human. it might be disgusting to have sex with a carcas however its not immoral if you had nothing to do with it |
OpBeat
Junior Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2005
Posts: 38
Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:27 pm
|
|
|
If someone fantasizes about having sex with a corpse... let alone doing it themselves, are we all failing to acknowledge the psychosis of this person would be strongly more messed up then the normal person for this sexual disorder to exist?
It is Necrophilia... c'mon, its not socially acceptable for a number of reasons. I mean it has striking similarity to the reason people desire to rape... and is incredibly unhealthy, rotting flesh... so much bacteria and diseases building. It's just masturbation truly... demented masturbation that shows some distressing personal relations if you can't find lust or the type of pleasure and comfort from a living human being, as so much to desire corpses.
How emotionally ill would these people have to be? Allot. To get turned on by the deceased... there is something wrong, all right. It is shocking for anyone to say differ. Sexual role playing and interacting with another individual about necrophilia, just putting someone in submission, I suppose, into some form of sadism... isn't as much a signal for terrible psychological health. But c'mon... necrophilia, the only reason a person should have for entertaining these fantasies is to defy social acceptance (to the extreme), and find a fuelling in proving the stupid notion “that its ok”... otherwise, that’s a calling card for being institutionalized.
And yes its immoral! It can be immoral in a million of ways; consenting to ones death isn’t the only way to be immoral, for fucksake. This is disrespecting the dead, however old tradition that may seem, it is one way of depravity. It’s really not complimentary to the former owner of that body... or the family still existing. The human condition and life, and to not admonish the sanctity of love and relationships... the act itself is not only grotesque and offensive... but to whitewash all meaning to life by sexually objectifying a corpse!? It's almost comical... in its pathetic insane ways... |
launchboxbill
Preferred Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 661
Location: sydney
Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:49 am
|
a person doesnt have to be emotionally ill. dude, youre projecting your own beliefs as other people's. some people get turned on obviously by the thought of a vagina without life in it. theres nothing psychologically wrong with it, it is merely onorthadox. waht the hell is wrong with all you people, its just a fetish, and as long as it doesnt involve an act of getting the body dead in teh first place, or in fact any role that would raise the chance of the death occuring, then its just a disgusting thing to do, that youd never tell anyone about. but psychologically ill? imoral? thats subjective to your own belief system, and clouds up the reality of what is going on. at any rate, necropheliacs generally only do that sort of thing in their fantasies, and to say someone is crazy because of fantasising about getting pleasure from a lifeless piece of meat (which is what a human body is when it doesnt have a mind/soul in it) is highly irrational |
OpBeat
Junior Member
Joined: 16 Oct 2005
Posts: 38
Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:54 pm
|
I'm sorry, I just cant see it... maybe society has me programmed to think one way about necrophilia, and that is that its taboo... and if its so much as considered by a person they are deranged. If you did a closer study to it... I just don’t see wanting to **** a lifeless vagina as a mere fetish... What ever happened to perversions with feet and simple things like that? I don't know, but all I know it’s a male wish to disconnect emotionally and take sexually objectification to the extreme... tsk... Someone needs to do case studies to show some actual accurate light on it.... Hmm… will research… dangerously. |
Mundiz
Junior Member
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 43
Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:28 pm
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by launchboxbill
a person doesnt have to be emotionally ill. dude, youre projecting your own beliefs as other people's. some people get turned on obviously by the thought of a vagina without life in it. theres nothing psychologically wrong with it, it is merely onorthadox. waht the hell is wrong with all you people, its just a fetish, and as long as it doesnt involve an act of getting the body dead in teh first place, or in fact any role that would raise the chance of the death occuring, then its just a disgusting thing to do, that youd never tell anyone about. but psychologically ill? imoral? thats subjective to your own belief system, and clouds up the reality of what is going on. at any rate, necropheliacs generally only do that sort of thing in their fantasies, and to say someone is crazy because of fantasising about getting pleasure from a lifeless piece of meat (which is what a human body is when it doesnt have a mind/soul in it) is highly irrational
Ok then mate, my fetish is killing your parents, siblings, all your friends and anybody else youre close to. My other fetish is to torture you until you can take it no longer and die. Am I merely unorthodox or am I actually a sadistic sick f##k who needs to be taken away and set aside from the rest of humanity?
Just adding a label saying something is a "fetish" doesn't make it right. |
Steven M
New Member
Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 11
Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:55 pm
|
Killing and being attracted to a corpse are two very different things bud. I don't persoanlly agree with Necrophillia, but that's a connection of two very different subjects. I assume whoever you quoted meant to say something like "As long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, whatever floats your boat." Though it may be disrespectfull and very dangerous to the one commiting the act...he/she isn't hurting anyone else in such a form as killing multiple people. |
Encelis
Full Member
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 229
Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:30 am
|
I found this list of symptoms for necrophilia:
* an inability to relate to living people
* language that includes numerous death-related or scatological words
* a tendency toward boredom and lifeless conversation
* a tendency to wear light-absorbing dark colors and to dislike bright colors
* the belief that resolving conflict involves force or violence
* an appreciation for machines over people
* dreams involving death, destruction or dead parts
* an interest in sickness
* a view that the past is more real than the present
* a fascination with bad odors
* an incapacity to laugh and tendency to smirk
* a lack of spontaneity
* lifeless, dry skin
* the worship of techniques or devices of destruction
* the compartmentalization of emotion and will
* insensitivity to tragedy involving loss of life
I don't know about the dry skin part... |
|
|
|
|
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
