davidbanner99@ wrote:I figure there's more to be gained by sticking to the facts we're sure about. By that, I mean it's a big leap ahead to argue all these vaccines were co-ordinated and planned to kill off populations.
For some reason you arrived at the heart of the matter at least a year after all the "conspiracy theorists". You think we
wanted to believe our governments were aiming for massive depopulation?
By summer 2020 (such as it was) I personally knew at least that there was something fishy going on. I would infinitely have preferred to believe we'd been locked down and masked for everyone's protection, and the regular announcements that if we all obeyed orders things would be "back to normal". But at some point you've seen enough, like seeing the necker cube or the young woman/old crone picture
https://www.moillusions.com/young-lady-or-old-hag/: once you've seen it, you can't UNsee it.
Logic dictates the question: Why not use a far more disguised method? For a start, a covert biological operation that simply uses plain bacteria? Without the need for vaccines.
You appear to believe money-making is irrelevant to this discussion. At least one country now has several times as many "vaccines" stockpiled as it has citizens. That sure is a shot in the arm for Bill Gates's bank balance! And the mugs are still queuing out the doors at "vaccine" centres.
Why not just agree on one vaccine? Why so many versions battling for the market? Why block Sputnik vaccines if there was already an agreement to collaborate?
I give you answers to your questions and you persist in ignoring them. So here it is again, the complete recipe for a "vaccine" in the fight against a virus that can never, possibly, be isolated:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/laqHdaOI36DC/I don't quite know what's behind the current breskdown in stability.
You're a riot, you really are.